The main argument I have heard for the 3-point shot is that it opens up the game, gives little guys more of a chance, and lets people catch up quicker. Well, if that is the case, why not have a 4-point shot? Anything behind half-court is four points. Three are guys who would take it, and who could make a fair enough percentage of them to be worth the risk.
I am being sarcastic, in case anyone cannot guess. We have catered to the fans and injured the game, so why not go all the way and turn it completely into a circus? That ought to really bring out the fans.
No comments:
Post a Comment