Most college coaches today fall all over themselves to sign a 5-star player, who is almost certain (under the current rules) to leave after one season. They barely have time to learn the system thoroughly and obviously never rise to their full potential while at the school. On the other hand, their talent is so great that it can sometimes carry the team.
Still, I wonder if that approach to recruiting garners the best return for the school. Are they better off constantly hiring and training highlighters, or recruiting 3-star or 4-star players who are much more likely to stay and contribute for their entire careers, developing a little school loyalty during their stay? Plus, by the time they are seniors, those players may be as good as the 5-stars were as freshmen. 1 X 100 does not total as much as 4 x 30.
No comments:
Post a Comment