I wouldn't touch a LaVar Ball recruit

Not even if he were a 5-star. Not even a 10-star. At some point talent just is not worth the baggage that comes with it.

Copying the NBA hurts

IMHO, the NBA plays a brand of team basketball that is inferior to the college game. That is one of the reasons that I hate to see the college game copying the NBA, but I suppose that is inevitable.

Those freebies along the way

No matter what else happens, any year when John Calipari has a bad year can't be a bad year for the sport of college basketball. Granted, "bad year" at Kentucky is a relative term given the level of talent he can command. But if Kentucky fans are disappointed, I am happy, at least to a little degree. Little Rock might have a bad year, but if the Wildcats also have one, then I salvage some degree of pleasure from the season. Call it a freebie.

An apology of sorts

I honestly think I need to apologize a little for this blog. I have followed Little Rock basketball since I got disgusted with Nolan Richardson and moved my loyalty to the next closest (at that time) D1 school.

It should be obvious that I am not a basketball expert in any wise. Set the Xs and Os in front of me and I am lost. The one thing I might know a little bit more about than most people is college basketball stats. Give me a roster and a stat sheet, and I can do a pretty good job of describing the team without knowing anything else about them. So you are not going to get much more than ignorant opinions from me, and bits that I pick up in the news here and there. And I know that that ignorance shows. But it is the joyful privilege of fans to cherish ignorant opinions, so I don't feel too badly about it.

I am old school - in most every way. I like fundamental. I don't like fancy. I like clean-cut. I don't like tattoos. And I realize that sometimes attitudes those get in the way of my calculations and at least partially invalidate my opinions. But, hey, it's a free country.

I have come close to shutting down this blog several times. After all, its readership is not overwhelming. Probably the main thing that has kept me going with is the fact that since our friend who had been at the Democrat shut down his blog and the message board traffic has dwindled badly with Doc's health issues, there really is not a regular stream of Little Rock basketball information on the internet.

So, I'll piddle along, at least for a while. Don't expect my opinions to have much merit (except maybe where statistics are concerned). Assume that I will continue to be a hidebound anachronism. But maybe in some small way we can help keep folks thinking about Little Rock basketball. Go Trojans!

Keep an eye on TAMU's front line

With Tyler Davis (6-10, 270) steamrolling the opposition on the inside, Texas A&M was going to be a problem inside for opponents to handle in any case. Then, when Robert Williams (6-9, 237) announced he was not going pro, they became perhaps the most physically imposing team around. Their roster for next season is not yet posted, but presumably Tonny Trocha-Morelos (6-10) and D. J. Hogg (6-9) will also be back, both of whom averaged over 26 minutes per game.

The thing that makes Davis and Williams such a load is not just their size - lots of teams have that - but their style of play. They are physical. Take no prisoners style. War zone basketball - the kind you don't see much any more (thanks to the 3-point shot). Williams had 77 blocks as a freshman, which was tied for 18th in the nation, and his upside potential is plumb scary.

Hadzic for SOY

Surprise of the Year. A contrived title, obviously. And, frankly, not a very apt one for this team, given the number of new faces we have: whatever happens is likely to be somewhat of a surprise. However, Hazdic is a true freshman, and as such might not be expected to be a huge contributor. But I am going to predict that he will play a significant role on this team. I base that on two reasons.

First, he already has spent a semester with the team, so he is ahead of the game on learning Flanigan's system. Second, he comes from a basketball family, with his father having coached the Bosnian national team and having won a bronze medal in the Olympics. Third, he has had international experience, having played for three seasons for the Bosnian national team. In 2013 he averaged over 13 minutes per game for the 16-and-under team and averaged 6.6 points per game.

Hadzic will have to overcome the "soft" tendencies of European big men, but there is a spot on this team for him if he works hard and is coachable. Having had a coach for a dad, I am guessing that he is.

The 3-point shot claims another victim

Ethan Happ is Wisconsin's wonderful 6-9 post player. He has as good a set of post moves as you will see in the college game today. Almost impossible to guard, and not because of superior athleticism, but because of good footwork and fundamentals. A story by CBS tells that he is trying to expand his perimeter game to include 3-point shots. I understand why. He is "only" 6-9, and at that height, in order to have a future in the pros, he probably will need to develop some perimeter skills. I hate to see it, though. We finally get a kid whose inside game is really superior, and he falls prey to the almighty three-point shot.

Who will we have to replace?

On the new roster, the only scholarship seniors are Mompremier (6-11) and Harley (6-9). It remains to be seen how big a factor either of them is, but regardless they will be two of our three tallest players. So, it is no surprise that we have been going hard after big men this recruiting season.

Nice when the big boys don't get everyone

I love it when a lower tier school gets a top-level recruit. Like when Navy got David Robinson. Obviously, it doesn't happen very often, but occasionally it will. For whatever reason some kids have a connection to a school and just want to go there; or maybe the coach just does the Sales Job of the Year on the recruit.

I like our recruiting focus

Recruit big men. Lots of big men. It appears we are going after them with a vengeance. That should pay dividends down the road. . . . And don't forget the point guards.

Here is a "cold" prospect for you

LINK

The story of a kid from Barrow, Alaska trying to make the big time in basketball. Look up Barrow on the map. As I type, on July 22, the temperature in Barrow is 38 degrees.

What is "success" at our level?

There won't be many Gonzagas - two or three at most. There are not even many teams that are at a level that they expect to win their conference every year, or at least be right in the hunt for it. Maybe 10% of the teams of our size, max. So, does a program have to be at that level to be a "success," whatever that is? "Certainly," some fans would say. "We buy our tickets and we expect a winner every season." (Of course, very few of those fans would be successes in their personal affairs at such a high level, but who notices that?)

Even more pertinent to the discussion, from where we are right now, what it the next step to success? What is the next level? Oh, sure, we had that one great season - but we couldn't keep the coach, which almost always is the result at our level when a team does have a remarkable season. Sustaining a high level of success at a level where accomplishment (winning) means defeat (losing the coach) is a very difficult thing.

But, as fans we should be able to expect something, shouldn't we? As a basketball school, I think we should be able to anticipate being in the top third of the conference year in and year out. (Throw football into the mix, trashing up the situation, and I don't know; but that hasn't happened yet, thankfully.) If we perform at that level, then with a couple of breaks in a given year, we should be right there for the regular season championship.We ought to be able to get to where a .500 season is a complete disaster, not just a "down year." We are not quite there yet, but that is an achievable goal.

The 30-win season raised expectations, and that is a good thing. However, it may have raised them temporarily to an unrealistic level, and that is not good. We do need to keep moving forward, and if we do that, at some point we will get where we want to be - at a high level of performance that can be sustained. It is out there somewhere.

Ryan Pippins' survival

I have to admit I am a little surprised that Ryan Pippins made the cut to stay on the roster.  He was obviously overweight last season when he weighed only 200 pounds, and how his bulk reportedly has ballooned up to 250. If that is correct, it is hard to imagine him retaining enough quickness to play point guard.

Everyone is down on Tubby

I don't know what is going on at Memphis. I do know that if the crop of players Tubby Smith had  were like some of the ones that have been in Sleeze City before he got there, I would have got rid of them, too. Or maybe Smith is just getting old and crabby; I can identify with that.

Be all that as it may, Tubby Smith has been one of the great coaches in the history of the game, and particularly one of the great program builders. If anyone is able to do more with less, he is the guy. It appears he will have to if they are going to have any success this season.

For the love of the game

"It's not whether you win or lose, but how you play the game." That is the old saying regarding sportsmanship. We might amend that slightly to say that it is not how much glory you get from playing, but just the fact that you are getting to play.

Ironic size

We have four players over 225# this year. Three of them are logical, with Mompremier, Hadzic and Black being in the 226-228 range, and all of them being 6-8 or taller. Our heavyweight, however, is only 6-0. A robust fellow, to say the least.

Out of work coaches

LINK

This link is to an article about the big-name coaches currently out of a job. There is a huge amount of talent that will be sitting on the sideline this next season. I cannot imagine that if they want to coach they will have much trouble finding jobs.

One returning starter - at most

Someone will probably say that we have one returning starter, since Deondre Burns did start 14 games, mostly toward the end of the season. However, that number is less than half our total of games, and he was sixth in total minutes played, so he does not make the grade that way either. So, any way you want to spin it, we will have one returning starter this season at most. Since none of our incoming players are particularly high-profile, that means we will likely not be picked very high in pre-season prognostications. That also means, hopefully, that we will be underrated and will finish higher than we are picked.

Not the most height we have had

This is not the most depth in size we have had. On the 2012-13 roster we had six players 6-8 and over, including four 6-10 or taller: Poulter, Javes, Neighbour, Leeper, White, and Evans.

You need length, but . . .

A team needs to have some true big men, if for no other reason than to play defense against the other team's big men. However, one of the really dominant inside players in the Sun Belt was 6-7 - not exactly a big man, although big enough, obviously. South Alabama's Augustine Rubit was a load in the middle, averaging a double-double over his career and shooting 721 free throws (making 72% of them).